Ukraine defense faces dilemma after Georgia crisis

1ASDSA-213.jpgKIEV (Reuters) – Ukraine’s defense sector has called for a big rise in funding for the military after Russia’s war with Georgia but its reliance on Russian supplies of weapons and parts poses a dilemma.

Ukraine’s leaders backed Georgia in the war over breakaway South Ossetia and expressed anger that Russia used ships from its fleet stationed in Ukraine’s Crimea region.

Politicians have voiced fears Ukraine could be Russia’s next target, although analysts say an imminent invasion is most unlikely.

“Russia’s actions have compelled our generals to look at the possibility of using force and this has handed them the argument that we must strengthen the armed forces,” military expert Serhiy Zgurets said.

But Ukraine has limited options to overhaul its military. If it meets its aim of joining NATO, Russia is likely to withhold the components it still needs to assemble its weapons. Switching entirely to NATO weapons would be hugely expensive.

Ukraine is among the world’s top 10 arms exporters. After the collapse of the Soviet Union it inherited a defense industry producing tanks, planes, anti-aircraft and radar systems and technological backup.

However, it has not been able to afford to buy what it exports. Ukraine’s defense budget this year is just 10 billion hryvnias ($2 billion) or 1 percent of gross domestic product.

“The Ukrainian army buys nothing new. Financing goes only towards feeding soldiers and supporting their battle-worthiness at whatever level,” said Serhiy Bondarchuk, head of the state arms export company, Ukrspetsexport.

The 200,000-strong armed forces still use ageing Soviet-designed fighter jets such as the MiG-29 and Su-24 and tanks like the T-62.

“Formally, all our technical resources are obsolete,” Zgurets said. “This does not mean that we will not use them.”

Artillery cannon, for example, last 15 years but Ukraine has had no new supplies since the Soviet days almost 20 years ago.

Bondarchuk says unless the army receives a minimum of 3 billion to 5 billion hryvnias per year for modernization and new purchases, soldiers will be coming out “on horses wielding sabers” at military parades.


Defence Minister Yuri Yekhanurov, supported by President Viktor Yushchenko, hopes this year’s budget will be amended to add another 5 billion hryvnias to buy new weapons. He wants to triple the defense budget to more than $6 billion in 2009.

According to defense industry publication Jane’s Industry Quarterly, Russia’s defense budget is $37 billion this year, Britain spends $80 billion, and the United States $700 billion.

“I think the situation in the world, which has recently seriously changed, will cause our politicians to think about the future of Ukraine. If they give us the possibility, we are ready to buy whatever is sitting in the factories,” Yekhanurov said.

Even if the budget is raised, Kiev must find a strategy that shrugs off reliance on Russia.

In a legacy from Soviet times, the production process for weapons systems is split between factories in Russia and Ukraine. Manufacturing a missile, for example, would require bringing in components from Russia.

Russia said in June it would severe all defense industry ties should Ukraine join NATO and later said it would replace Ukrainian-made engines in its cruise missiles with local ones.

Analysts say the domestic defense industry could only meet 10 percent of the army’s needs. If Russia does cut defense ties, Ukraine’s armed forces would have to be totally overhauled to be able to buy from NATO members.

“There is a strategic problem modernizing even the basic components of our weapons,” Zgurets said.

The alternative could be to halt the process of joining NATO. But Yushchenko has made NATO membership a cornerstone of his policy of integration with the West and says it is the best way to protect Ukraine from any aggression.

Zgurets said if Ukraine turns its back on NATO it could continue buying from Russia, as well as other non-NATO military suppliers such as Sweden, known for its jets, and Israel, with its good logistical equipment.

Check Also

When Leaders Chase A Mirage!

Naturally, they tend to fool themselves the most with others being fooled on a little …