World Leaders, Experts Criticize US Policy in Afghanistan

Czech President described the U.S. withdrawal from Afghanistan as cowardice and a dramatic failure of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization.

World leaders, political commentators, and foreign affairs experts have joined the international chorus denouncing the U.S. policy in Afghanistan, under which a 20-year military deployment suddenly came to a chaotic end.

On Tuesday, German President Frank-Walter Steinmeier said the sudden downfall of the Afghan government and the Taliban’s swift takeover has cast a “long shadow” over the West’s efforts to build a stable and lasting community.

“Scenes of despair at Kabul airport are shameful for the political Wes,” he said, adding that the failure of the West’s years-long efforts in Afghanistan “raises questions about the past and future of our foreign policy and military engagement.”

French President Emmanuel Macron called for “a responsible and united response” within the United Nations Security Council on Afghanistan where the Taliban has regained power, warning against the risk of irregular migration flows to Europe caused by the destabilization of Afghanistan.

Czech President described the U.S. withdrawal from Afghanistan as cowardice and a dramatic failure of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), warning of intensifying mistrust within NATO of the legitimacy of the U.S. existence as a so-called world leader.

“It has been rather catastrophic. It has been a long-term commitment for 20 years to make a better Afghanistan,” former Swedish Prime Minister Carl Bildt said on Monday. Describing the U.S. withdrawal as “unforgivable,” Bildt questioned the move, saying that he was surprised by “the lack of preparation, the fact that one or the other knew what was going to happen.”

French national daily Le Monde on Monday listed “the painful questions after the mistakes in Afghanistan.”

“By decreeing a military withdrawal from Afghanistan before the 20th anniversary of 9/11, Biden put an end to a double error. On one hand, the West had no reason to deploy in Afghanistan in 2002, the year following the victory of the anti-Taliban forces — one does not occupy militarily a country where there is no longer an enemy to fight,” it wrote.

“On the other hand, their very presence served as a magnet for the Taliban to resume the fight, fueling an Afghan civil war that did not exist at the end of 2001… Now that the Taliban have reconquered Kabul and will exercise power, there are only painful questions left,” it said.

Newspaper Le Figaro quoted congressmen who criticized Biden for his failure to plan the withdrawal, now a humiliating failure being played out in front of cameras around the world.

“This is an absolute disaster, of epic proportions;” “Joe Biden has blood on his hands;” “The very fact that we did not even succeed in securing the civilian area of Kabul airport speaks volumes about our moral and operational shortcomings,” the congressmen was quoted as saying.

Peter Neumann, a German political scientist at King’s College London, told state broadcaster ARD on Tuesday that the Taliban was often presented as a terrorist organization but neglected as a Pashto militant deeply rooted in the local religious and social establishment, whose support has been always there.

NATO Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg said there was a need for “an honest, clear-eyed assessment of NATO’s own engagement in Afghanistan,” adding that “despite our considerable investment and sacrifice over two decades, the collapse was swift and sudden. There are many lessons to be learned.”

Check Also

NATO and a War Foretold

As NATO holds its Summit in Madrid on June 28-30, the war in Ukraine is …