The Paradox at the Heart of U.S. Engagement in the Middle East

If Washington is as committed as ever to its historical role as security guarantor in the Middle East, why do U.S. officials feel compelled to constantly reassure their regional partners that the U.S. isn’t pulling back from the region?

The question speaks to the disconnect between Washington’s strategic interests in the Middle East and the priorities of its regional partners. It also reflects the difficulty U.S. policymakers face in seeking to exert influence in a region beset by poor governance and a multiplicity of state, nonstate and hybrid actors.

Check Also

A fractured front: Autonomy or integration for Syria’s Kurds?

As Damascus enters the US-led coalition against ISIS, its relationship with Syria’s Kurds, America’s longstanding …